Abstract
The apparel industry’s supply chain is a complex network with significant environmental impacts, yet small-scale elements, such as clothing labels and hang tags, are often overlooked in sustainability efforts. These secondary materials contribute to resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon emissions due to their high production volumes and poor recyclability. This study examines how innovations in small-scale elements, exemplified by the Unity SSA initiative, can transform apparel supply chains to enhance overall sustainability. By integrating recycled wood composites and biodegradable polymers Unity SSA reduces environmental footprints and aligns with circular economy principles. Using a systems-thinking approach, this research analyzes the role of secondary materials in supply chain sustainability, identifies barriers to implementation, and proposes strategies for systemic change. Findings suggest that reimagining the management of small-scale elements can catalyze broader environmental improvements in the apparel industry.
Introduction
The apparel industry is a major contributor to global environmental degradation, accounting for approximately 10% of carbon emissions and 20% of wastewater (UNEP 2022). While sustainability efforts typically focus on primary textiles and manufacturing processes, secondary materials, such as clothing labels and hang tags, represent a significant yet understudied component of the supply chain. These materials, often made from virgin cardboard or plastic, contribute to resource depletion, waste accumulation, and emissions due to their ubiquity and poor end-of-life management (Zero Waste Europe 2022). This study investigates how innovations in small-scale elements, such as the Unity SSA initiative, can drive systemic sustainability improvements in apparel supply chains. The research question is: How can the management of small-scale elements like clothing labels enhance the overall sustainability of the apparel supply chain? Employing a systems-thinking framework, this study evaluates the environmental impact of secondary materials and proposes strategies to integrate sustainable innovations into supply chain practices
Theoretical Framework
Systems thinking provides a theoretical lens for understanding the apparel supply chain as an interconnected network where small-scale elements influence overall sustainability outcomes (Meadows, 2008). The circular economy, which emphasizes resource efficiency, material reuse, and waste minimization (Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2020), complements this framework by offering principles for redesigning supply chains. Secondary materials, such as clothing labels, are critical leverage points within this system, as their high volume and lifecycle impacts amplify environmental consequences (Textile Exchange, 2023). The hypothesis is that innovations in secondary materials, such as Unity SSA, can act as catalysts for systemic change by reducing resource consumption, waste, and emissions, thereby enhancing supply chain sustainability.
Methodology
This study adopts a mixed-methods approach to assess the role of small-scale elements in apparel supply chain sustainability. Quantitative data were sourced from lifecycle assessments (LCAs) and environmental impact studies ( Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023; UNEP 2022). Qualitative data were derived from case studies of the Unity SSA initiative and industry reports on supply chain practices (Textile Exchange, 2023; Zero Waste Europe, 2022). Key variables include
1 Resource Consumption Measured as water, energy, and raw material inputs for label production
2 Waste Generation Quantified by recyclability rates and end-of-life disposal impacts.
3 Carbon Emissions Assessed through CO2-equivalent emissions across the label lifecycle
A systems-thinking analysis was applied to map the interconnections between secondary materials and broader supply chain dynamics, identifying leverage points for sustainability improvements. The Unity SSA initiative was evaluated as a case study to quantify its impact on these variables compared to conventional labels
Results
4.1 Environmental Impact of Secondary Materials
Secondary materials, such as clothing labels, have a significant environmental footprint within the apparel supply chain. Virgin cardboard labels require 2.5–7 tons of water per ton produced and generate 1.2 tons of CO2 per ton (Pulp and Paper International, 2019; Journal of Cleaner Production 2023). Plastic labels, derived from fossil fuels, produce approximately 6 kg of CO2 per kg and contribute to microplastic pollution (Nature Communications 2020). Additionally, 70% of cardboard labels are coated with non-recyclable plastic films, and 85% of textile-related waste, including labels, is landfilled or incinerated (Zero Waste Europe, 2022; UNEP, 2022). These findings indicate that secondary materials exacerbate resource depletion, waste accumulation, and emissions, undermining supply chain sustainability
4.2 The Unity SSA Initiative as a Leverage Point
The Unity SSA initiative introduces a transformative approach to secondary materials by using recycled wood composites and biodegradable plant-based polymers. Lifecycle assessments demonstrate that Unity SSA labels reduce water consumption by 50% and carbon emissions by 30% compared to traditional cardboard labels ( Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023). By utilizing industrial wood residues, the initiative decreases tree consumption by up to 40% (World Resources Institute, 2021). Its biodegradable materials ensure minimal waste persistence, aligning with circular economy principles of material reuse and waste minimization ( Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020). These attributes position *Unity SSA* as a leverage point for systemic sustainability improvements in the apparel supply chain.
4.3 Systemic Impacts on Supply Chain Sustainability The adoption of Unity SSA has cascading effects across the supply chain
- Upstream Impacts : Reduced reliance on virgin resources decreases pressure on natural ecosystems, supporting sustainable sourcing (World Resources Institute, 2021)
- Midstream Impacts The use of biodegradable materials simplifies waste management, reducing disposal costs and environmental impacts (UNEP, 2022).
- Downstream Impacts Labels with premium, sustainable aesthetics enhance consumer perceptions, with 65% of European consumers preferring eco-friendly packaging (McKinsey & Company, 2022), potentially increasing brand loyalty and market share.
These results suggest that small-scale innovations can drive systemic change by addressing multiple supply chain stages
5. Discussion
The findings highlight the critical role of small-scale elements in enhancing apparel supply chain sustainability Conventional labels, with their resource-intensive production and non-recyclable properties, represent a significant barrier to achieving circular economy goals (Textile Exchange, 2023). In contrast, Unity SSA demonstrates how targeted innovations can reduce environmental impacts and create positive feedback loops across the supply chain. Systems thinking reveals that secondary materials are leverage points with disproportionate influence due to their high volume and lifecycle impacts (Meadows, 2008). However, several barriers limit the scalability of such innovations:
5.1 Barriers to Implementation
Cost Constraints: Developing and scaling sustainable materials requires significant investment, which may be prohibitive for smaller brands (World Resources Institute, 2021)
Supply Chain Complexity Integrating new materials necessitates coordination across suppliers, manufacturers, and retailers, posing logistical challenges (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020)
Regulatory Gaps: The absence of mandatory standards for secondary materials, as noted in the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles (2022), allows unsustainable practices to persist (Textile Exchange, 2023)
Consumer Awareness Limited understanding of secondary materials’ environmental impact constrains demand for sustainable alternatives (McKinsey & Company, 2022)
5.2 Strategies for Systemic Change
To overcome these barriers and maximize the impact of innovations like Unity SSA, the following strategies are proposed
1. Regulatory Mandates Implement EU regulations requiring minimum recycled content and biodegradability for secondary materials, aligning with the Single-Use Plastics Directive (2019)
2. Financial Incentives Offer grants or tax exemptions for companies adopting sustainable materials, reducing economic barriers (European Environment Agency, 2021)
3 Supply Chain Collaboration Foster partnerships between material innovators, brands, and logistics providers to streamline adoption of sustainable secondary materials (Textile Exchange, 2023)
4. Consumer Education Launch campaigns to highlight the environmental significance of small-scale elements, leveraging consumer preferences for sustainability (McKinsey & Company 2022) These strategies align with systems-thinking principles by addressing interconnected supply chain dynamics and creating enabling conditions for sustainable innovation
Critique of Current Practices
Current supply chain practices often prioritize cost and efficiency over sustainability, particularly for secondary materials. The widespread use of non-recyclable, plastic-coated cardboard labels and persistent plastic labels reflects a linear approach that contradicts circular economy principles ( Zero Waste Europe 2022). Moreover, the lack of transparency, with 60% of brands failing to disclose label material composition (Greenpeace, 2021), perpetuates greenwashing and undermines consumer trust. Innovations like Unity SSA address these shortcomings by embedding circularity into material design, but their impact remains limited without systemic adoption across the supply chain
Conclusion
Small-scale elements, such as clothing labels, play a critical role in the sustainability of the apparel supply chain due to their cumulative environmental impact. The Unity SSA initiative demonstrates how innovative materials can reduce resource consumption, waste, and emissions, serving as a leverage point for systemic change. By integrating systems-thinking and circular economy principles, the apparel industry can reimagine its supply chain to prioritize sustainability. However, achieving this transformation requires overcoming economic, regulatory, and logistical barriers through targeted policies, industry collaboration, and consumer engagement. By focusing on small-scale elements, the industry can drive an environmental revolution, aligning with global sustainability objectives and fostering a more resilient supply chain
References
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020) A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future
European Environment Agency. (2021) Water use in European industry
Greenpeace. (2021) Transparency in fashion labeling
Journal of Cleaner Production. (2023). Environmental impact of recycled wood composites Journal of Cleaner Production, 389 136045 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136045
McKinsey & Company. (2022) Consumer preferences for sustainable packaging
Meadows, D. H. (2008) Thinking in systems: A primer Chelsea Green Publishing.
Nature Communications. (2020). Carbon footprint of plastic production Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17966-2
Pulp and Paper International. (2019). Water use in cardboard production Pulp and Paper International, 61*(3), 45–50.
Textile Exchange. (2023) EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles
UNEP. (2022) Textile waste: A growing global challenge
World Resources Institute. (2021) Sustainable use of wood residues
Zero Waste Europe. (2022) The hidden impact of coated cardboard